90 5.0
Active Member
Want!!!!!!!!!!!!!
With an easy 600-800 horsepower available I think it's the prettiest thing I've ever seen. LolI don't care how much faster it may be.....that thing is WAY TOO D@MN UGLY to even think about going on a transom of my boat!
for sure if it already bolts to a mercury leg...although I went to the site and WOW that is some coin $22,000 euros is like $29K plus shipping and taxes. WOWWith an easy 600-800 horsepower available I think it's the prettiest thing I've ever seen. Lol
A technolgical beauty....but physically hideous LOL Much like the Mercury turbine motor.With an easy 600-800 horsepower available I think it's the prettiest thing I've ever seen. Lol
Somebody could stick one on a carbon STV and have a real ride...I think past about 500 hp you'd have some real handling issues with a light XR2001. The bigger, heavier boats could soak up some more ponies
You must have me confused with Rick Conklin.....he has the coin. ;0). I am boat poor.That price could come down with more interest. Prolly never happen though. If I had Dave Hensley's money I'd buy two of em. Lol
If I had Rick's money I'd buy the companyYou must have me confused with Rick Conklin.....he has the coin. ;0). I am boat poor.
An engine like that won't do it, due to the lack of throttle response and lag... A sharply set up 2.5 merc barks hard and immediately at the hit of the throttle.. Any turbo'd engine will be playing catch-up at that point, and I don't think a 1500cc 500 hp engine is gonna make it...Huge power out of a bullet proof engine. Perhaps a 4 cylinder 1.5l Hayabusa turbo with 500hp would do it in dragracing?
For a racing application yes, but from a lake motor standpoint I could live with the lag for a 250 to 300 hp motor that turns 10000 rpms dependably.An engine like that won't do it, due to the lack of throttle response and lag... A sharply set up 2.5 merc barks hard and immediately at the hit of the throttle.. Any turbo'd engine will be playing catch-up at that point, and I don't think a 1500cc 500 hp engine is gonna make it...
I think it will take some of the 3.0 or larger 4-stroke forced induction set-ups to do it, but it will eventually happen just simply due to the unrelenting hp that they'll make... It will be a tough task to do it in the 1/8 mile because the of the first 150 foot snap of the mercs, but in the full 1/4 mile drags where a turbo motor can boost up and feed itself I don't think a 2.5 merc will be able to hold them off..
AS far as dirt bikes, didn't the 4 strokes get a displacment advantage to compete with the 2 strokes? So will a 250cc 4-stroke outperform a 250cc 2-stroke?For a racing application yes, but from a lake motor standpoint I could live with the lag for a 250 to 300 hp motor that turns 10000 rpms dependably.
Nobody likes the change, I remember when two stroke dirtbikes were the end all be all, then along came the 450s. Now the only place you see a two stroke is on the trail or an enduro. Lets hope for a light, fast affordable four stroke on the horizon.
Yes they did get an advantage, 200 cc to be exact. As far as power, a 250 two stroke will leave a 250 four stroke in the dust, with the right rider. The four stroke is much easier to manage in the tight stuff for sure. They have come a long way from the old Honda XR.AS far as dirt bikes, didn't the 4 strokes get a displacment advantage to compete with the 2 strokes? So will a 250cc 4-stroke outperform a 250cc 2-stroke?
Your right, big change is coming. A new Suzuki Hayabusa goes for around 12000, you would think a marine engine could be built off that design, be affordable, scream on top and idle for hours using modest amounts of fuel.CC for CC the 2-stroke will typically win until you get into the type engines like the street bikes that make 160+ hp w/ 1000cc and will idle like a sewing machine...
The real kicker in the racing scene will be the advent of the turbo... The 4-strokers will adapt to that like a duck to water, then it's all over but trying to figure out how to control it...