Which heads are interchangeable?

Bobalouie

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
827
Points
28
Location
Edmond, OK
Bob... I don't know either but I would guess it's the larger volume/area in the chamber because of the plug hole. I do know that if you cc the heads you will know what the deal is in relation to comp. numbers.
Thats exactly it. By using a short reach adapter in a plug hole for a long reach plug, you effectively add volume to the cylinder and comp goes down.
 

2003225X

Active Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
450
Points
16
A stock 225x head is approximately 36.5cc. A 260/280/300 drag head cannot be interchanged with a 225x head.
 

David Lanham

Active Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
302
Points
18
Below is what Jay posed on S&F: I could not get the link to work:

"Just got through rebuild and moding a 225X motor today, shipping it this week, we machined heads to clean up damaged and replace OEM O rings ( looked as good as factory by the way , both water and compression side !!! ) Did compression tests and all with in 1-2 lbs, tally was a litle lower than I expected until I figured out the compression testor plug side adapter is short ( 1/2" thread ) the 225X motor is long reach ( like a Big Block Chevy ) SOOOO IF the compression fitting was to go to the correct depth as the normal long reach plug it would been right on my targets of 140 lbs at sea level..

Just food for thought..

Jay"
 

catfish123

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2005
Messages
1,938
Points
38
I just wonder how much difference this really makes in the readings............when I find out, I'll let everyone know.
 

LakeAnna

Active Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
881
Points
28
Location
The Dock
I out 14 mm x 6.35 mm into a cylinder volume calculator and it spit out 3.91 cc
Eric I was trying to find something on the net to calculate the dang stuff... I used a syringe to figure my old ones... Not sure how close that was but they came up to 34cc (260 heads).
I pulled the plug, leveled the head and used thin tape to seal the plug hole in the chamber and filled it with water....hmmm I need to find something more productive to mess with.:big grin
 

Bobalouie

Active Member
Joined
May 12, 2005
Messages
827
Points
28
Location
Edmond, OK
I think it is less than 1 cc. The formula is Pi * r^2 * H, where Pi is 3.14, the radius is 7mm or 0.275", and H is .25" Multiplying that all out you get 0.059 cubic inches, which converts to 0.966 CC.

Converting over to metric first yeilds 0.977cc.
 

john4utvols

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
1,220
Points
38
Location
Lawrenceburg, Tn
I did not read every post but the first page I thought you said your rev limiter was 7300 or 7500. I'm not sure how close a 225x is to a 225 promax but we took a promax and raised the limiter to 7400 and changed the gear ratio to 1.75 and with a 28 we could hit 103-104 almost every day. We did try changing the compression to 145 but that didn't seem to matter on top end.
 

john4utvols

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
1,220
Points
38
Location
Lawrenceburg, Tn
Thought I would throw this in on reading compression. I was reading compression on a motor and the battery was suppose to be full charged but it was reading 122 on all cylinders. So I put jumper cables on the battery and this made a big difference it jumped all the cylinders up to 128. This was a cold engine read too, i like to warm them up a little if i can. I always take all the plugs out when reading compression and try to put cables on to give the battery the maximize output.
 

john4utvols

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
1,220
Points
38
Location
Lawrenceburg, Tn
Nope xb2002....... xb2003 would be around 98- 100. That was more of a example of what the gears did for our speed. It went from 94-96 to 103-104 by moving the rev limiter up to 7400 and changing the gears to 1.75
 
Last edited:

suicidealli

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2008
Messages
4,206
Points
38
Location
Southern ky, lake Cumberland
1.75 gears with a motor that has some torq, can really work well. The gear ratio changes the torq. The lower ratio means you will run a smaller pitch prop as well. The smaller the pitch the more efficient the is on average. When I go from 1.87 case to my 1.75 case my slip drops between 30-40 %. With 1.87 usually 7-9% slip with a good worked prop.
1.75 2-5%. so it is worth a couple mph on the big end, if you are running a 100. Not much but it is consistent.. Usually drop 2" of pitch for most props when you make the change... There are a lot more 26-28 pitchnprops out there then 30-32 props too. Usually cheaper as well in the used market.. The 3.0L guys buy up a lot of 30p props..

Roy
 
Top